Promoting the value of scrutiny and accountability
in modern and effective government


Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scrutiny of Local Area Agreements: two new wiki projects
08-07-2009, 01:55 PM
Post: #1
RE: Scrutiny of Local Area Agreements: two new wiki projects
Thanks for this - very useful.

Apologies if the following query has been answered elsewhere but I'll ask anyway - do partners with a duty to cooperate only need to cooperate when there is a link to an LAA target? If so, I think this would mean that partners like the Highways Agency would not need to attend scrutiny at my authority. I imagine that some would be tempted to make some tenuous links with LAA targets just to get partners to attend?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2009, 01:55 PM
Post: #2
RE: Scrutiny of Local Area Agreements: two new wiki projects
Thanks for this - very useful.

Apologies if the following query has been answered elsewhere but I'll ask anyway - do partners with a duty to cooperate only need to cooperate when there is a link to an LAA target? If so, I think this would mean that partners like the Highways Agency would not need to attend scrutiny at my authority. I imagine that some would be tempted to make some tenuous links with LAA targets just to get partners to attend?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2009, 03:44 PM
Post: #3
RE: Scrutiny of Local Area Agreements: two new wiki projects
The legal duty is to co-operate with the council (the county council in two tier areas) in negotiating an LAA, and then to have regard to every target which relates to the organisation. What 'have regard to' means is set out in the Statutory Guidance, but essentially it means help to achieve it. The duties to respond to scrutiny relate to the LAA targets, yes. The LAA document will show which organisations are signed up to which targets, although one of the questions scrutiny could ask is whether all the appropriate organisations are signed up and doing what they should be doing.

That's the legal minimum. One of the aims of the guide and other work with the partnership you might do locally, would be to encourage partners to see the purpose of scrutiny and engage with it beyond the legal minimum.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Centre For Public Scrutiny | Return to Top | Return to Content | RSS Syndication