Promoting the value of scrutiny and accountability
in modern and effective government


Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Testing the validity of reports and ensuring they are robust
21-07-2009, 11:24 AM
Post: #1
RE: Testing the validity of reports and ensuring they are robust
Did a session on this in Wales last week.

A very rough way of doing this is obviously to make sure that recommendations themselves are "SMART" although it is obviously a bit more complex than this.

I will see if I can dig out something else on this for you.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
28-07-2009, 09:53 AM
Post: #2
RE: Testing the validity of reports and ensuring they are robust
Ehammond Wrote:Did a session on this in Wales last week.

A very rough way of doing this is obviously to make sure that recommendations themselves are "SMART" although it is obviously a bit more complex than this.

I will see if I can dig out something else on this for you.

Thanks Ed that would be really useful, look forward to hearing from you.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
29-07-2009, 11:00 AM
Post: #3
RE: Testing the validity of reports and ensuring they are robust
When completing working group investigations we always try to test the recommendations we are making with those orgainisations that they are going to affect. We also try to circulate the report too so any inaccuracies can be removed. This is generally successful and helps improve recommendations and increase their chance of being accepted.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
29-07-2009, 11:22 AM
Post: #4
RE: Testing the validity of reports and ensuring they are robust
Craig Goodall Wrote:When completing working group investigations we always try to test the recommendations we are making with those orgainisations that they are going to affect. We also try to circulate the report too so any inaccuracies can be removed. This is generally successful and helps improve recommendations and increase their chance of being accepted.

Hi, I follow the approach above. There is a balance between presenting recommendations which can be implemented easily and those which present a challenge to the Cabinet and Chief Officers of the authority. There are some occasions when the purpose of the report is to get a debate going between members abotut the relative merits of the report , which can lead to changes to the final recommedations which can they can be implemented and deliver better than would be otherwise be the case.

The issue of presenting recommendations with sometimes no budgetary implications has been an ongoing complaint about scrutiny reports.

All the reports recommendations should be supported by the evidence in the report. I drafted a checklist of things to think about when putting together recommendations, which you might be helpful in testing the validity of reports - contact me if you would like me to send you a copy.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Centre For Public Scrutiny | Return to Top | Return to Content | RSS Syndication