centre for public scrutiny

Promoting the value of scrutiny and accountability
in modern and effective government

Current time: 23-10-2014, 04:29 AM Hi there, Guest! (Login)
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Future Forum reports today
24-06-2011, 01:23 PM
Post: #11
RE: Future Forum reports today
The Government response to the Future Forum goes some way towards redeeming the obfuscatory and tautological, circular approach of "parallel scrutiny" introduced in the Patient Involvement and Public Accountability report (HealthWatch scrutinises scrutiny, scrutiny scrutinises HealthWatch, see Claire's post above). This report, whilst asserting that it wishes to bring clarity to the role of HealthWatch, does quite the opposite. For example, it continues to assert the flawed principle of a decision-making body holding itself to account, (recognised as such by previous consultations on the matter), i.e. that HealthWatch should exercise the role of scrutiny and challenge. Quote: "HealthWatch will be particularly well placed to provide this challenge given their role on health and wellbeing boards." Does this still need debate?
So, although not ideal, the government's response, rather than the Future Forum accountability report itself, is to be welcomed. It is essential that continued efforts are made to ensure that Health Scrutiny Powers remain with Health Overview and scrutiny Committees and not generally with the authority.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
30-06-2011, 12:49 PM
Post: #12
RE: Future Forum reports today
At the LGG Conference this morning Andrew Lansley announced £1m to support the development of health and wellbeing boards. We hope to be doing some work with HWBs/Consortia and OSCs from the autumn.

Our 'Accountability Works for You' framework, also launched at the LGG conference yesterday, is an ideal tool to support the embedding of positive relationships and culture in the work of Boards.

Incidentally, Andrew Lansley specifically referred to the strenghtening of powers of overview and scrutiny committees - this is interesting given the previous proposals to strenghten 'LA powers of health scrutiny', not necessarily based on health OSCs. Could the policy be changing?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-07-2011, 11:13 AM
Post: #13
RE: Future Forum reports today
healthscrutineer Wrote:At the LGG Conference this morning Andrew Lansley announced £1m to support the development of health and wellbeing boards. We hope to be doing some work with HWBs/Consortia and OSCs from the autumn.

Our 'Accountability Works for You' framework, also launched at the LGG conference yesterday, is an ideal tool to support the embedding of positive relationships and culture in the work of Boards.

Incidentally, Andrew Lansley specifically referred to the strenghtening of powers of overview and scrutiny committees - this is interesting given the previous proposals to strenghten 'LA powers of health scrutiny', not necessarily based on health OSCs. Could the policy be changing?

That's interesting, I couldn't see this referenced in the press release. I wonder when we hear more!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Contact Us | Centre For Public Scrutiny | Return to Top | Return to Content | RSS Syndication